Blog – Page 2

The Governance Wall and AI Regulation

The era of artificial intelligence as a competitive advantage has hit a structural barrier – the Governance Wall. Some time back in 2024 and 2025, organizations raced to adopt AI tools to automate decisions, improve efficiency and cut costs. Now, as we move through 2026, the conversation is shifting from “How powerful is your AI?” to “Can you explain its decisions to a regulator, customer or even a judge?”

As global regulations move from abstract guidelines to strict enforcement, businesses must move from pure automation to strategies defined by traceable, human-centred oversight.

The Shift From Innovation to Accountability

In the early days of AI adoption, the priority was speed and results. Algorithms made decisions behind the scenes with little transparency. As AI improved, it was used in high-stakes scenarios like screening job applications, approving loans, detecting fraud and influencing health decisions. When these systems make mistakes, there are consequences that could include lost opportunities, discrimination claims or legal exposure.

As a result, regulators and even consumers are demanding answers. This shift has seen businesses move from AI innovation to AI accountability, where every automated decision must be justified, traceable, and explainable.

The Governance Wall and Regulatory Landscape

The governance wall refers to the growing layers of regulation, policies, and legal expectations that AI systems must pass before deployment.

EU AI Act, which will take full effect in August, have set a global gold standard for transparency. One of the articles in this law is the Right to Explanation, which requires any company using AI for high-risk decisions to explain the logic behind the output.

Across the United States, some states have already introduced stricter AI-related rules. Notable examples include California’s AB 2013 and Colorado’s SB 24-205 state laws requiring businesses to disclose when AI is used in consequential life decisions, such as hiring, insurance premiums, or credit lending.

The Real Business Impact

For many businesses, this shift is more than a compliance issue as it introduces a complete operational change.

Explainability is no longer optional
AI systems must be designed in a way that allows you to explain outcomes clearly. For instance, if a system rejects a loan application or filters out a job candidate, you must be able to justify why. Hence, a system must have transparent algorithms, clear logic pathways, and documented decision criteria.
Audit trails are becoming mandatory
Businesses are now expected to maintain audit trails. These are detailed records showing what the AI did, when it did it, and why it made a specific decision. If regulators or legal teams ask questions, you must provide evidence and not assumptions.
Pre-use notices and opt-out options
Before an AI agent processes a customer’s data, a business may be required to notify the customer that AI is being used, explain how it impacts them, and offer a way to opt out.
Board-level oversight
AI is no longer just an IT concern. Executives and directors are increasingly responsible for managing AI-related risks, ensuring compliance with regulations, and protecting the company from legal exposure. In other words, the AI strategy must align with the legal and risk management strategy.

The SEC and the AI Washing Crackdown

While local regulators focus on consumers, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is focusing on investors. As AI becomes a buzzword, many companies are tempted to exaggerate their capabilities. This practice, known as AI washing, involves claiming to use advanced AI when the technology used is minimal or non-existent. Companies do this to attract investors, boost valuation, and appear innovative in a competitive market.

The SEC has made it clear that any AI claims that are misleading will be treated as securities fraud. This is not just a problem for tech giants, as even small and medium businesses seeking funding are having their tech stacks audited. Firms found in violation face serious consequences – as happened to Delphia and Global Predictions, which had to pay $400,000 in penalties.

Strategic Solutions

For a business to scale without being paralyzed by regulations, it must:

Implement Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) systems by positioning human staff as quality assurance to sign off on high-stakes outputs. This will provide the human judgment layer that regulators demand.
Adopt small language models as they are smaller, domain-specific, and easier to interpret and audit. They also offer explainable AI (XAI) capabilities, making it easy to show your work.
Unified governance to facilitate compliance. This will require leadership, including legal (interpret laws), IT (build audit trails), and HR or operations (manage the human oversight) to work together.

Facilitating Access to Housing and In-State Tuition, Sanctioning Iran and the Battle Over DHS Funding

21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (HR 6644) – As many local governments face the problem of rising affordability and severe housing shortages, this bipartisan bill would update existing housing programs to increase the housing supply, as well as streamline federal regulations that slow construction. Among its provisions, the legislation would authorize a pilot program designed to convert vacant or underused buildings into residential housing, issue grants for infrastructure improvements for utilities and transportation, and include construction of new housing units for low- and moderate-income residents. The legislation was introduced on Dec. 11, 2025, by Rep. French Hill (R-AR). It originally passed in the House on Feb. 9, but the Senate made changes before passing it on March 12. It has returned to the House for a final vote.

Territorial Student Access to Higher Education Act (HR 6472) – This act would amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide for in-state tuition rates for certain residents of Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, and the United States Virgin Islands. The bill would help offset the high cost of attending college on the U.S. mainland, which prohibitively adds thousands of dollars to airfare, housing, and basic living expenses incurred by citizens of U.S. territories. The legislation was introduced by Rep. James Moylan (R-Guam) on Dec. 4, 2025. It passed the House on March 7 and is currently under consideration in the Senate.

Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act of 2025 (HR 1422) – On Feb. 8, 2025, Rep. Michael Lawler (R-NY) introduced this bill to strengthen secondary sanctions on foreign entities (e.g., banks, insurers, pipeline construction and operation facilities) that help process, export, or sell illicit Iranian oil, including for liquified natural gas. The bill lay dormant in the House until late February, when the U.S. launched its attack on Iran. On March 10, the bill was updated to include an interagency work group to develop more sanctions related to Iran and a multinational effort to enforce sanctions. The latest version of the act was passed in the House on March 16; its fate currently lies in the Senate.

Servicemembers’ Credit Monitoring Enhancement Act (S 2074) – The purpose of this bill is to provide free credit monitoring for veterans. Presently, only active duty members can take advantage of this service. The bill was introduced by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) on June 12, 2025. It passed unanimously in the Senate on March 5 and is currently under consideration in the House.

Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 (HR 7744) – This is the bill that is currently holding up appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30. The bill was introduced by Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) on March 2 and passed in the House on March 5. However, it has triggered a partial government shutdown and is under heated debate in the Senate. Republicans insist on passing the complete bill with increased funding for national security and border protection. The legislation also includes provisions prohibiting funds for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and Critical Race Theory programs, as well as abortions and gender-affirming care for ICE detainees. Senate Democrats are seeking to include guardrails that would prohibit ICE agents from wearing masks or entering homes, schools, hospitals, etc., without a judicial warrant.

PAY TSA Act of 2026 – Rep. Nick Langworthy (R-NY) introduced a carve-out bill for DHS on March 16, authorizing specific fees already collected to fund the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) during shutdowns. The bill would direct the Aviation Passenger Security Fee (initiated after the 9/11 terror attacks) to be used to pay TSA agents during any period that TSA appropriations lapse. Airlines currently charge this passenger fee ($5.60 for a one-way trip and up to $11.20 for a round-trip) for flights that originate in the United States. The bill is not expected to pass due to Republican opposition to carving out funding from the general DHS appropriations bill.

End Special Treatment for Congress at Airports Act of 2026 (S 4123) – Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) introduced this bill on March 17 as a companion bill reflecting stalled appropriations for DHS – and for TSA workers specifically. The bill calls for a ban on Congressional lawmakers’ current preferential status that enables them to sidestep security checkpoint lines at U.S. airports. The ban would require members of Congress to wait in TSA lines along with other passengers. The bill passed in the Senate on March 19, and its fate now lies with the House.

Version 2

Filing Your 2025 Taxes? Why Accuracy Matters More Than Ever This Year

Tax season is here, and while the IRS opened its doors for 2025 returns on Jan. 26, with the familiar April 15 deadline intact, this year’s filing experience is shaping up to be anything but routine. A perfect storm of workforce cuts, rushed new tax breaks, and strained systems means that getting your return right the first time has never been more important.

A Smaller IRS With a Bigger Job

The numbers tell a sobering story. According to the Taxpayer Advocate, the IRS entered this filing season with 27 percent fewer employees than it had just a year ago. Congressional funding clawbacks combined with the Department of Government Efficiency’s push for retirements and reductions have hollowed out the agency’s capacity at nearly every level.

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration warned that the IRS could struggle this year, noting that by Dec. 30, 2025, the agency had managed to onboard only two percent of the employees it was authorized to hire for submission processing. The culprits? New hiring procedures imposed by the Trump Administration and delays stemming from last year’s record 43-day government shutdown.

What does this mean for you? Automated systems will continue handling straightforward electronic returns efficiently. But anything requiring human attention, whether that’s an amended filing, identity verification or a return flagged for errors, will move at a crawl. Phone lines will be even harder to get through than usual, if you can get through at all.

New Deductions, New Confusion

Adding complexity to an already strained system, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that President Trump signed in July introduced a set of temporary tax breaks that took effect retroactively for 2025. These include deductions for tips, overtime, seniors, and car loan interest, all requiring new forms, schedules and guidance that had to be produced in a hurry.

The potential for mistakes is significant, especially for the 45 percent of filers who prepare their own returns. Most 2025 W2 forms will not break out overtime pay separately, leaving taxpayers to figure it out themselves. And despite the political rhetoric around “no tax on Social Security,” the reality is a larger deduction for seniors that phases out as income rises. Some recipients may not realize they still need to report their benefits as taxable income.

The SALT cap increase from $10,000 to $40,000 is good news for many, but it also means taxpayers should take a fresh look at whether itemizing now makes more sense than claiming the standard deduction.

Direct Deposit or Prepare to Wait

The IRS is pushing hard for electronic refunds, and for good reason. Most error free, electronically filed returns with direct deposit are processed within 21 days. But if you prefer a paper check or accidentally provide incorrect bank account information, expect a much longer wait with fewer staff available to sort out problems.

Returns sent by mail? Plan on six weeks or more. Amended returns are averaging five months or longer, and the IRS is already working through an elevated backlog from prior years.

The Bottom Line

Accuracy matters more than speed this year. The system still works well for straightforward, completely correct returns, but it is far less forgiving when something goes wrong. If you are uncertain about how to handle one of the new deductions or think you might be missing documentation, filing for an automatic extension is a smarter move than submitting a return with errors.

File electronically. Double-check every entry. Use direct deposit. And if your situation is at all complicated, seek out a tax professional who can help you navigate a filing season where the margin for error has never been thinner.

Understanding Qualifying Dispositions

With 57 percent of public companies offering their workers employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), according to the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals (NASPP), understanding how qualifying dispositions work is an essential skill.

The concept refers to someone selling or otherwise “disposing” of equities who sees advantageous tax benefits. This is especially pronounced when a stockholder’s normal tax income rate differs markedly from prevailing tax rates for long-term investments.

Eligible individuals are those employed by a company that offers such a benefit. There are two different options available for worker participation.

The first option is where employees participate in the ESPP. The second option is through an incentive stock option plan (ISOs). It’s noteworthy to distinguish that the ESPP is for most employees employed after a particular time at a company. However, ISOs are reserved primarily for senior management and executives, such as chief financial officers (CFOs), chief executive officers (CEOs), etc.

What determines if it’s a qualifying disposition is how long the employee keeps the equities prior to the sale.

ESPP Example

If 100 shares are acquired via ESPP, bought via a 10 percent discount to the prevailing offer of $40, the purchase of 100 shares of stock at $36 equals $3,600. If the stock appreciates to $60 in the future, the difference (and capital gain) would be $2,400 in profits ($6,000 – $3,600).

Qualifying Disposition Example

This scenario breaks down how the discount and, ultimately, how capital gains are treated.

The discount of $4 per share is taxed at the employee’s present wage rate. Depending on the tax rate the employee is taxed at, the liability would be ($4 a share, multiplied by 100, times the tax rate of 30 percent or $120).

Using the ESPP example’s figures, the long-term gain of $24 per share (times 100 shares) is taxed based on the lesser rate of say 15 percent. ($3.60/share times 100 = $360).

Therefore, the entire taxes owed end up being $120 + $360 = $480.

Non-Qualifying Disposition Example

However, for stock liquidations not meeting qualifying disposition criteria, the $2,400 would see a 35 percent capital gains tax ($2,400 multiplied by 35 percent = $840).

Based on the qualifying versus non-qualifying distribution scenarios, the difference of $360 in capital gains savings represents a stark contrast in tax obligations. Therefore, it’s important to determine how to meet a qualifying disposition.

It requires the following criteria to be met. The stock sale date must occur at a minimum of 12 months from the stock purchase date. It also must be held for at least 24 months from the ESPP offer date or the ISO stock warrant date.

While transactions may differ in the quantity of shares sold and for how much, the timing for workers selling the shares is far less variable. It is important for employers to ensure workers are familiar with the tax implications.

Sources

https://www.naspp.com/blog/five-trends-in-espps

The Value of Diversifying with International Stocks

When investors think about building a strong equity portfolio, U.S. stocks often dominate the conversation. The United States is home to many of the world’s most innovative, profitable, and well-known companies, and has a history of delivering strong long-term returns. However, the United States is not the only country with successful, growth-oriented businesses. In fact, nearly half of the global equity market is located outside the United States, offering investors a much broader opportunity than in domestic markets alone.

Despite this reality, many investors stick to a home country bias. This behavioral tendency means they prefer companies headquartered in their own country because they’re more familiar and feel safer. Unfortunately, home country bias can unintentionally increase portfolio risk. A singular concentration of investments in one geographic region exposes investors to country-specific economic cycles, policy changes, and market disruptions, while limiting access to attractive opportunities elsewhere in the world.

Global investing offers the following benefits:

Overall Diversification – Spreading investments across different markets, sectors, industries, companies and currencies in various countries improves opportunities for higher growth potential while balancing risk.
Highly Regarded Brand Names – Investing internationally offers access to a larger universe of well-established global brands. Household names such as Toyota, Nestlé, and Samsung are headquartered outside the United States, yet they generate revenues throughout the world, boasting strong balance sheets, consistent cash flow, and favorable long-term prospects. International stocks offer investors exposure to global innovation and consumption trends beyond U.S. markets.
Sector Diversification – In recent years, the U.S. stock market has become saturated with information technology and related industries – even among broad market index funds. While tech is a powerful growth driver, this concentration increases portfolio risk if the sector underperforms. International markets tend to have greater representation in other sectors, such as industrials, financials, materials, and consumer staples, so adding international stocks can help diversify overall sector exposure.
Currency Diversification – International investing exposes U.S. investors to foreign currencies, which reflect the economic conditions of their respective countries. Because currencies do not always move in tandem, holding assets denominated in multiple currencies can help reduce overall portfolio volatility. For example, if the U.S. dollar weakens, gains from foreign currencies may partially offset losses in U.S. dollar-denominated investments. While currency movements can add risk in the short term, they may provide an additional layer of diversification over the long term.
Country Diversification – International investing extends beyond developed markets to include emerging economies around the globe. Emerging markets are countries experiencing rapid economic growth, industrialization, and rising household incomes. Examples include India, Brazil, South Korea, and Taiwan. While emerging markets can offer higher growth potential, they also tend to be more volatile. For this reason, investors should consider allocating only a modest portion of their international exposure to emerging markets as part of a diversified strategy.

Diversify Risk Via Your Investment Vehicle

While international stocks offer diversification and growth potential, they also come with distinct risks, including regulatory differences, lower market liquidity, and political instability. Also note that international investments may involve higher transaction costs compared to domestic securities, especially when purchasing individual foreign stocks

Investors can help mitigate these risks by choosing inherently diversified investment vehicles, such as international mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Broad index-tracking funds are often the most cost-effective way to gain exposure, while professionally managed mutual funds can actively navigate changing global conditions.

International stocks provide access to companies, markets, and currencies that cannot be reached through domestic investments alone. When thoughtfully integrated into a portfolio, they may enhance diversification and improve long-term risk-adjusted returns.

5 Tax Tips for High Earners

If you’re a high-income earner, generally defined as household incomes over $350,000, there are some key things you might want to keep in mind come tax season. Here are a few of the strategies to consider that not only maximize your financial benefits but also minimize tax liabilities.

Boost Retirement Contributions

By increasing savings in your 401(k) and IRA accounts, you can reduce your current tax liability while building your nest egg. Here’s a closer look:

401(k)s – In 2026, you can contribute up to $24,500. If you’re over 50, there’s a catch-up option of an extra $8,000, and better still, if you’re between 60-63, the catch-up contribution limit increases to $11,250. By doing these things, you lower your income and, thus, your tax bill.
Traditional IRAs – You can contribute up to $7,500 in 2026 with an additional catch-up contribution of $1,100 for individuals age 50 and older. Note that while you can make traditional IRA contributions regardless of income levels, the tax deduction phases out at certain income thresholds.
Roth IRAs – These products are popular because they let you sock away after-tax dollars. That said, your eligibility to contribute, capped at $7,500 in 2026, varies with income levels. Taxes are paid up front, but withdrawals, including earnings, are tax-free later. Woot! Beware, however, that the ability to directly contribute to a Roth IRA starts to phase out at $153,000 for single filers and $242,000 for those married filing jointly.

Implement Tax-Efficient Investments

Here are three more strategies to consider for reducing your tax burden:

Buy municipal bonds. With these securities, you may gain tax-free income that reduces your taxable income.
Buy dividend-paying stocks. Payouts from stocks give you lower-taxed income and wealth growth.
Invest in opportunity zones. These zones, defined as underserved, low-income communities, not only offer tax deferral but also provide community investment. Paying it forward pays yourself – and others.

Leverage Charitable Giving

donor-advised fund (DAF), which is an efficient way to manage your giving while securing tax benefits. You can set one up through a financial institution or a community foundation. Once you contribute, you’ll get an immediate tax deduction. However, this deduction is subject to certain limitations based on your adjusted gross income (AGI) – 60 percent for cash contributions and 30 percent for contributions of appreciated securities. Still, it reduces your taxable income for the current year. And that’s a good thing.

Gift Assets to Your Family

This is another good strategic move. Both you and your relatives will love it. In fact, the IRS lets you give up to $19,000 per year (as of 2026) without triggering gift taxes. Think college tuition or home down payments. However, while gifting assets can reduce the size of your taxable estate, it does not reduce your taxable income for income tax purposes. But here’s the upside: By using the gift tax exclusion, you’ll avoid increasing your estate tax liability later on.

Utilize Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCDs)

If you’re retired and over 70 ½, QCDs offer a powerful tax advantage. Get this: you can transfer up to $111,000 annually (in 2026) directly from your IRA to qualified charities without counting that amount as taxable income.

These are just a few of the ways high-earners can strategize for taxes. But no matter what tools and strategies you harness, the goal is to put together a smart plan so you can keep more of what you earn.

Sources

https://www.farther.com/foundations/tax-planning-strategies-for-high-income-earners#:~:text=401(k)%20and%20IRA%20Contributions,situation%20and%20provide%20personalized%20advice

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/minimum-salary-required-considered-top-170108488.html?guccounter=1

Cloud Sovereignty vs. Big Tech: How Businesses Are Avoiding the ‘AI Lock-in’ Trap in 2026

Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a competitive advantage; it has become a necessary infrastructure. Businesses now heavily rely on AI-powered systems, from automated customer service to predictive analytics and decision-making tools. These platforms are cloud-based, and their reliance comes with growing concern of AI lock-in. This dependence on major cloud providers and the convenience of Big Tech ecosystems can turn into long-term dependency. In response, cloud sovereignty is gaining momentum.

What Is Cloud Sovereignty?

Cloud sovereignty refers to the ability of an organization to maintain full control over its data, infrastructure, and digital assets. This includes where data is stored, how it is processed, and which legal jurisdiction governs it.

Unlike traditional cloud hosting, where companies rely on a single global provider, cloud sovereignty emphasizes:

Data ownership and portability
Compliance with local laws and regulations
Reduced dependence on foreign-controlled infrastructure
Strategic control over AI models and workflows

The Rise of Big Tech and the AI Lock-in Problem

Over the past decade, companies like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure have built highly integrated AI ecosystems, especially since the surge of generative AI. These platforms offer powerful tools, including proprietary machine learning services, exclusive Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), pre-trained AI models, and seamless infrastructure scaling.

collapse of Builder.ai, an AI app builder backed by giants like Microsoft and the Qatar Investment Authority. Its collapse was an indicator that companies do not have complete control over the software and data on which their operations depend. This is what is known as AI Lock-in, where:

AI models rely on proprietary APIs
Data pipelines are optimized for a specific cloud architecture
Workflows depend on unique vendor tools
Migration costs become prohibitively high

As a result, businesses suffer:

Escalating operational costs
Limited negotiating power
Reduced flexibility
Strategic vulnerability

In 2026, with AI deeply embedded into operations, being locked-in can threaten long-term agility and innovation.

Regulatory Pressure is Accelerating the Shift

Governments worldwide are tightening digital sovereignty and data protection rules. From stricter data residency laws to AI governance frameworks, compliance is no longer optional. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications face heightened scrutiny. They must prove where data is stored, who can access it, and how AI models are trained and governed. Additionally, businesses can’t afford regulatory risks. Regulations such as the CLOUD Act demand data access transparency, while different states are pushing for data localization policies.

Relying entirely on a foreign-controlled AI ecosystem can raise compliance risks. In some regions, businesses are now required to use local or sovereign cloud providers for sensitive workloads. Gartner predicts 35 percent of countries will adopt region-specific AI platforms by 2027 as countries increase investment in domestic AI stacks to meet sovereignty goals.

Regulation, once seen as a burden, is now a strategic driver pushing companies toward sovereign-first strategies.

How Businesses Are Avoiding AI Lock-in Trap

Businesses are not abandoning cloud AI. Instead, they are becoming more strategic about how they implement it.

Embracing open-source and interoperable AI
Many businesses are adopting open-source AI frameworks and models to reduce dependency on proprietary systems. By building on interoperable standards, they maintain flexibility to deploy workloads across different environments. This approach allows businesses to experiment freely without being tied to a single vendor’s ecosystem.
Adopting multi-cloud and hybrid strategies
Rather than relying on one provider, a business can distribute workloads across multiple clouds. This reduces operational risk, strengthens negotiation leverage, enhances flexibility and improves resilience. Hybrid models, where on-premise infrastructure is combined with cloud services, are also growing in popularity. They ensure sensitive data remains locally controlled while still leveraging AI scalability.
Partnering with sovereign or regional cloud providers
Regional cloud providers are gaining traction as they offer local data hosting, compliance with national regulations, and greater transparency.
Strengthening contract and governance frameworks
Procurement and legal teams are now playing a more active role in cloud decisions. They negotiate stronger data portability clauses, clear exit strategies, transparent pricing structures, and model ownership rights.

Final Thoughts

In 2026, the real risk is not using AI, but losing control over it.

Cloud sovereignty represents a strategic shift while not rejecting Big Tech. It must be viewed as the ability to act strategically, as no business can dominate every layer of the AI stack due to constraints like the high cost of training advanced AI models.

Businesses that prioritize sovereignty today are building resilient, flexible, and future-ready AI ecosystems. Those who ignore it may find themselves powerful – but trapped.

Burying Time Capsules, Ending Payments to Dead People, and Safeguarding Voting Rights for U.S. Citizens

Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the DC Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025 (HJRes 142) – After passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Council of the District of Columbia (DC) opted out of the tax code from the Act, amending several provisions and restoring the DC child tax credit. This resolution nullifies DC’s amended legislation. It was introduced on Jan. 22 by Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX). It passed in the House on Feb. 4, the Senate on Feb. 12, and was enacted on Feb. 18.

Semiquincentennial Congressional Time Capsule Act (S 3705) – This bill instructs the Architect of the Capitol to bury a time capsule in the Capitol Visitor Center (on or before July 4, 2026) as part of this year’s 250th anniversary celebration of the nation’s founding. The purpose of the capsule is to represent legislative milestones to date via a joint letter to the future Congress by the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and the House. The time capsule is meant to remain there until July 4, 2276, the nation’s 500th anniversary. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) on Jan. 27. It passed the Senate on Jan. 27, the House on Feb. 9, and was signed into law by the president on Feb. 18.

Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025 (S 3424) – This Act was introduced by Rep. Christopher Coons (D-DE) on Dec. 10, 2025, and passed in the Senate on the same day. It cleared the House on Jan. 12 and was signed into law on Feb. 6. The bill makes alterations to the administration of bankruptcy cases by increasing fees paid to trustees in Chapter 7 (liquidation) cases, and extends by five years the fees paid to trustees in Chapter 11 (reorganization) cases. It also extends the term of bankruptcy judgeships in various districts, as well as other provisions.

Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act (S 269) – This legislation requires the Social Security Administration (SSA) to share its death records with the Treasury Department in order to prevent improper payments to deceased individuals. In the past, this bill had to be extended every three years, but the new bill makes the requirement permanent. The bill was introduced by Sen. John Kennedy (R-TN) on Jan. 28, 2025. It passed unanimously in the Senate on Sept. 19, 2025, cleared the House on Jan. 13, and was enacted on Feb. 10.

Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (S 1383) – This controversial voting bill passed in the House on Feb. 11. The Republicans in the Senate have secured 50 votes for passage, but the bill requires 60. The provisions in the current bill include requiring:

Each state is to submit full voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for verification of citizenship via its SAVE system, which has historically had a high error rate of flagging citizens as non-citizens.
Voter roll purges every 30 days and end the 90-day quiet period that allows voters mistakenly purged time to re-register before Election Day.
New or changing voter registrants to show proof of U.S. citizenship (birth certificate or passport; five states already meet this requirement for a Real ID driver’s license).
Voters to show photo ID at polls in order to vote (38 states already require this)
A ban on automatically mailing ballots to all voters (currently used by eight states and DC); voters would have to send individual requests to receive a mail ballot.

Democrats in the Senate have vowed to block passage via filibuster.

What Your Tax Preparer Wishes You Already Knew

Most people approach tax season thinking about one thing: getting their return done. What they rarely think about is what the experience looks like from the other side of the desk. Having seen it from both angles, I can tell you there’s a real difference between clients who make a preparer’s job easy and those who quietly make it harder than it needs to be.

Here’s why that matters to you specifically: being a better client isn’t about being polite for politeness’ sake. It translates directly into lower bills, faster turnarounds, and better advice. This is entirely in your own interest.

First, Understand How You’re Being Charged

The way the preparer bills you should shape how you work with them. There are three common arrangements, and each one rewards organization in a different way.

If you’re on a flat fee, the dollar amount doesn’t change whether your documents are immaculate or a complete mess. But here’s what does change: a preparer who powers through your tidy file in two hours now has time to actually think about your situation. That might mean spotting a deduction you’ve been missing for years or flagging something worth changing before next filing season. Advice like that can easily be worth more than the return preparation itself, but it only happens when there’s time and mental energy left over to give it.

Hourly billing leaves no room for ambiguity. Every follow-up email, every clarifying phone call, every minute your return sits untouched while you track down a missing form, it all runs the meter. Most of that extra cost is entirely preventable with a little upfront effort.

The hybrid model, which is a base fee with overage charges for complexity, is the most common setup you’ll encounter. Most preparers are generous about absorbing minor extra work without comment. But when documents arrive in scattered batches, questions go unanswered for days, and the timeline keeps slipping, that goodwill has a limit. And again, the extra charges that result are almost always avoidable.

There’s one more piece to this that doesn’t show up on any invoice. Tax preparers are human, and like anyone doing service work, they have clients they genuinely enjoy and clients they quietly dread. The ones they enjoy tend to get more, for example, a heads-up about a planning opportunity, a faster turnaround when things are hectic, and a little extra thought applied to their situation. Difficult clients still receive competent, professional service. They just don’t get the extras. That’s not a policy; it’s just how people work.

The Three Things That Actually Move the Needle

None of this requires becoming a tax expert. It really comes down to three habits.

Send everything at once, and send it organized. Before you submit anything, set aside an evening to go through your documents. W-2s, 1099s, interest statements, charitable contribution records, mortgage forms, gather everything. If your preparer sends you an intake organizer or questionnaire, use it. It exists because it tells them exactly what they need in the format that’s easiest to work with. If they don’t use one, just organize things logically and label your files clearly. “Scan_final_2” is not a file name. A small amount of effort on your end saves a disproportionate amount of time on theirs.

Don’t send documents as they trickle in. It’s tempting to forward your W-2 the moment it hits your inbox, making you feel like you’ve gotten ahead of things. In practice, piecemeal delivery creates more problems than it solves, for example, things get overlooked, work gets duplicated, and many preparers won’t even open a file until they believe everything has arrived. There are legitimate exceptions: a K-1 that shows up late, a corrected 1099 that comes in after the fact. Any experienced preparer will understand those situations. But make them the exception rather than your default approach.

Respond promptly when they reach out. When your preparer sends you a question, it usually means they’re actively working on your file and have hit a wall they can’t get past without your input. A week-long delay doesn’t just slow things down; it forces them to set your return aside entirely and context-switch back to it later. That kind of stop-and-start cycle costs time, and depending on your billing arrangement, it may cost you money too.

Conclusion

A single organized evening and a commitment to responding quickly when questions come up. That’s genuinely most of what separates the clients’ preparers who enjoy working with them from the ones they don’t. In return, you get a smoother process, a more accurate return, and very likely some guidance you’d never have received if you’d shown up with a shoebox and gone quiet.

What to Expect from U.S. Tax Policy in 2026

After a whirlwind 2025 that produced what may be the largest tax bill in American history, the coming year looks dramatically different. Tax policy experts are predicting a legislative standstill, a turbulent tax filing season, and lingering questions about how new provisions will work when put into practice.

A Year of Legislative Gridlock

The forecast for 2026 tax legislation is bleak. With Republicans clinging to an impossibly thin House majority of just 218 or 219 seats following recent resignations, passing any significant bills will be extraordinarily difficult. Every single Republican vote would be needed to advance legislation through reconciliation, and as 2025 demonstrated, keeping the caucus unified is no small feat.

While there has been discussion about a potential second reconciliation bill, most observers view this as wishful thinking. If such a bill were to materialize, it would likely focus on technical corrections to lingering Tax Cuts and Jobs Act issues and problems that emerged from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. One notable concern involves accelerated research credits that did not deliver the benefits lawmakers intended because of unexpected interactions with the corporate alternative minimum tax.

The more pressing concern will simply be keeping the government running. A January deadline looms to avoid another shutdown and, given the contentious relationship between House Republicans and Democrats throughout 2025, even basic funding bills face uncertain prospects. With midterm elections consuming attention in the second half of the year, legislative bandwidth for tax policy will be virtually nonexistent.

A Rough Road Ahead for Taxpayers

The 2026 tax filing season is shaping up to be challenging. The IRS has experienced unprecedented upheaval, losing somewhere between 20 percent and 25 percent of its workforce through a combination of voluntary resignations and reductions in force. Many of these departures came from enforcement divisions, though customer service will also feel the impact.

Leadership instability has compounded these problems. The agency cycled through roughly seven commissioners or acting commissioners in 2025 alone. Former Congressman Billy Long was confirmed as commissioner but lasted less than two months before departing under unclear circumstances. The Treasury Secretary has since taken direct oversight of the agency, and an IRS CEO position was created for the first time in the agency’s history. No new commissioner nominee has been put forward, and there is currently no Senate-confirmed chief counsel either.

For taxpayers who need more than basic return processing, this means longer wait times, fewer answered phone calls, and potential delays. Those filing straightforward W-2 returns seeking refunds will likely fare better than individuals or businesses with complicated situations requiring IRS assistance. Audit rates will decline intentionally, as the current administration has committed to scaling back the enforcement emphasis of the Biden years.

The Justice Department’s Tax Division also has been gutted, losing many qualified litigators who previously maintained an exceptional track record against large taxpayers in court. This erosion of enforcement capability may not immediately move voluntary compliance numbers, but continued cuts will eventually catch up with the system.

Unresolved International Questions

The relationship between U.S. tax policy and the global minimum tax framework under Pillar 2 remains unsettled. Republicans declined to include a retaliatory tax provision known as section 899 in last year’s legislation based on an agreement with G20 nations. If that agreement unravels, there may be pressure to revisit retaliatory measures, though passing such legislation with current House margins seems unlikely.

American companies operating internationally could face pressure in foreign jurisdictions if the United States fails to align with Pillar 2 requirements. While many in Washington believe the international minimum tax framework will collapse, the reality on the ground suggests otherwise, and this disconnect might force future legislative action.

Conclusion

The bottom line for 2026: expect a holding pattern on major tax legislation and brace for a difficult filing season as an understaffed and unsettled IRS works to implement last year’s massive changes.

Public Accountants

Category: Blog